Week+of+Oct+6

Wow, man I had such a long and relaxed weekend. Even though my weekend was pretty unproductive.. Well.. sometimes I need it I guess. Anyway, today, I'm going to finally upload the images that I captured on Thursday and attempt to make analysis about those.
 * Oct 6, Monday**

//* Scan Range was set still at 6.24nm while I decreased the value of Z-range.//
 * 1. Change in wave and scanned image when Z-range is altered.**
 * __Z- range__
 * The lower value we put, the more detail we could observe.
 * It seems that the wave length and also amplitude to increase as we put smaller values to Z-range.
 * Below scanned images show clear example of what I stated above. ( The values of Z-range get smaller as the image goes down.)
 * [[image:ad_stimulation2.JPG caption="large Z-Range 6.250nm"]]

2.** **Change in wave and scanned image when Scan Range is altered.** //* Z-////Range was set still at 0.781nm while I decreased the value of Scan Range.//
 * __Scan range__
 * Similar to Z-range, the smaller range gave much more detailed image.
 * It seems that the wave length increases and amplitude decreases as as we put smaller values to Scan Range.
 * Below scanned images show clear example of what I stated above. ( The values of Scan Range get smaller as the image goes down.)



Tuesday, I thought that I should better have more background information for STM. Well I just thought about it that it would be nice :)
 * Oct 7, Tuesday**

Time seriously flies. Today, the weather was little bit gloomy. Plus it rained a bit. After that flood incident ( not to my house, but I witnessed lots of flood....), I just want more sunlight. Plus, Fall astoundingly just approached. It's really chilly especially during morning. Considering about the weather, I just wondered whether or not STM's outcome (scanned images) can be affected by the temperature of specimen's surface.
 * Oct 8, Wednesday**

Today, we tried to get an image from STM but it did not work, unfortunately. Well, we don't know the exact reason yet. So I'm going to do the exercise which is to find the estimate of the carbon bond length from the stimulation images that I captured. This might be not very accurate. It's just an approximation. We just need some simple geometry here.
 * Oct 9, Thursday**

Well,, we cannot clearly see what I have made, but the approximate carbon bonding length seems to be .263128 nm. I basically use the Pythagoras to get a x. I will try to work on getting more clear images below.